2001 v 1996 MAF

Discuss your 2000-2005 Bonneville SE, SLE, SSEi, Buick Le Sabre 00-05 and Buick Park Avenue 97-05. Please use General Chat for non-mechanical issues, and Performance and Brainstorming for improvements.
Post Reply
jddem
SLE Member
SLE Member
Posts: 92
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 12:21 am
Year and Trim: 2001 SSEi

2001 v 1996 MAF

Post by jddem »

Can I use a MAF from a 1996 Bonneville 3800 on my 2001 SSEi 3800?
Part numbers (AUTOZONE) are 2001 – DL-3011, 1996 – DL-3012
The screw holes and plug both line up, look identical EXCEPT the 1996 has a shorter plastic piece that goes into the intake vs the 2001.
Now the 2001 SE and SSEi share a MAF so the supercharger is not a factor from what I can tell.
I’m thinking it’s a thing where the 96 will work on both but the 2001 will only work on the 2001.
Image
User avatar
redfury
Posts like an LN3
Posts like an LN3
Posts: 522
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:15 am
Year and Trim: 2000 SLE Saved from the scrapyard.
Location: Isanti, MN

Re: 2001 v 1996 MAF

Post by redfury »

You'd probably want to measure resistances between the 2 to know for sure, but usually MAF design is changed mostly due to improvements for airflow, or integration ( such as a bolt on MAF vs an inline version that is held in place with band clamps.
A temporary fix does not exist. It becomes a solution until it needs to be fixed again.
Image
https://photos.google.com/album/AF1QipO ... SiIKeTzuHy
jddem
SLE Member
SLE Member
Posts: 92
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 12:21 am
Year and Trim: 2001 SSEi

Re: 2001 v 1996 MAF

Post by jddem »

how do i measure resistance?
Image
maxi426
SSE Member
SSE Member
Posts: 117
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 4:21 pm
Year and Trim: 2003 SSEi
1999 Park Ave. Ultra L67

Re: 2001 v 1996 MAF

Post by maxi426 »

Sorry, I don't know the answer to your question, but the MAF sensor generates a signal so I don't think that you can measure resistance to compare
96 SSEi
Posts like a Northstar
Posts like a Northstar
Posts: 1813
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 11:11 pm
Year and Trim: 2000 Bonniville SSEi L67
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: 2001 v 1996 MAF

Post by 96 SSEi »

NO, you cant. the holes line up fine but the wires that get the reading are too short: the 200+ have a much longer stalk to put the wires in the centre of TB. the reading wont be accurate.

I already tried and it didnt work- got po300 codes

put a used delco in and all is good
poverty forces one to do unorthodox things

2000 SSEi
past rides:
1996 SSEi
1992 GTP
1987 Grand Am
jddem
SLE Member
SLE Member
Posts: 92
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 12:21 am
Year and Trim: 2001 SSEi

Re: 2001 v 1996 MAF

Post by jddem »

I put 96 MAF in my 2001. No problems, hard to tell if it runs any different but no codes or anything.
The stalk on the 2001 was longer, but the metal filament thing is in the same location.
Now the 2001 may not fit in the 96 due to stalk size, however the 96 is working in the 2001.
Image
Jrs3800
Retired Admin/Techinfo Admin
Retired Admin/Techinfo Admin
Posts: 26009
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 2:08 pm
Year and Trim: 03 SLE, 95 SE, 95 TS SE
Location: Space Coast, or at least it used to be

Re: 2001 v 1996 MAF

Post by Jrs3800 »

I would not do that... The frequency range between the( 96-98 ) AFH50M-04 is different than the 99-05( AFH50M-05 )..

For anyone reading this, Please Do Not use a 96 MAF on a 99-05..
jddem
SLE Member
SLE Member
Posts: 92
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 12:21 am
Year and Trim: 2001 SSEi

Re: 2001 v 1996 MAF

Post by jddem »

I wasn't able to find the specs on the MAFs.
What are the differences between them and what could result from using the wrong one?
Since i swapped mine,
I haven't driven the car with any major significance. (maybe 10-15 miles)
Currently I don't really see a difference (maybe it appears slightly more responsive, could be psychological though since I'm looking for an improvement...)
No codes have been thrown, I asked a mechanic prior to attempting this and he said it wouldn't run if it didn't work.


Thanks
Image
Post Reply