Looking for "new" Bonneville
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2013 1:57 am
Hey folks, the Bonneville bug never let go after I sold my last one, and I'm looking for another. I'll be buying at tax time, end of Jan / beginning of Feb most likely.
This time I'm widening my options. After seeing so many at junkyards, I'm partial to the late 90's style, mostly because of their smaller size and I like the old-style interior better. I wouldn't be opposed to a 2000-2003(?) either, but it has to have the L67.
My question more relates to how reliable the early generation is, and what the common problems are? I already know what to expect on the 00+ cars, as I'm pretty sure I encountered every possible problem they have. But I have no idea what to expect from the earlier generation, or how they compare to the newer. Obviously finding a well-taken care of, low mileage car is more of a challenge, but they're out there. They don't use road salt here in CO, so older cars are generally in good shape, though I don't mind traveling further south or outside the rust belt to find one. Ideally I'm looking for a '96(??) (when they introduced the Series II) to '99 with less than 150k. Don't the early cars use a 4T60E, and are they worth a s*it? Any info you can give me, pros and cons early versus new, would be appreciated. I have no qualms with getting the newer model, other than "been there done that." But I know I definitely want to be in a Bonneville. The altitude here sucks a N/A or supercharged engine dry (turbos shine it seems), but hopefully a smaller pulley and bolt-ons will compensate... Maybe someone from a high altitude will chime in!
This time I'm widening my options. After seeing so many at junkyards, I'm partial to the late 90's style, mostly because of their smaller size and I like the old-style interior better. I wouldn't be opposed to a 2000-2003(?) either, but it has to have the L67.
My question more relates to how reliable the early generation is, and what the common problems are? I already know what to expect on the 00+ cars, as I'm pretty sure I encountered every possible problem they have. But I have no idea what to expect from the earlier generation, or how they compare to the newer. Obviously finding a well-taken care of, low mileage car is more of a challenge, but they're out there. They don't use road salt here in CO, so older cars are generally in good shape, though I don't mind traveling further south or outside the rust belt to find one. Ideally I'm looking for a '96(??) (when they introduced the Series II) to '99 with less than 150k. Don't the early cars use a 4T60E, and are they worth a s*it? Any info you can give me, pros and cons early versus new, would be appreciated. I have no qualms with getting the newer model, other than "been there done that." But I know I definitely want to be in a Bonneville. The altitude here sucks a N/A or supercharged engine dry (turbos shine it seems), but hopefully a smaller pulley and bolt-ons will compensate... Maybe someone from a high altitude will chime in!