There are a few things wrong with this ad
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:19 pm
lets see..
It's not a 97.
Is it really green?
The interior doesn't look to green either.
Where did he get this idea of a turbo?
hmmm...
PontiacBonnevilleClub.com
The forum for Pontiac Bonneville enthusiasts
http://www.pontiacbonnevilleclub.com/forum/
There are a few things wrong with this ad
http://www.pontiacbonnevilleclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=16777
Page 1 of 2
Re: There are a few things wrong with this ad
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:24 pm
LOL
lets see..
It's not a 97.
Is it really green?
The interior doesn't look to green either.
Where did he get this idea of a turbo?
hmmm...
lets see..
It's not a 97.
Is it really green?
The interior doesn't look to green either.
Where did he get this idea of a turbo?
hmmm...
Re: There are a few things wrong with this ad
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:32 pm
There is even more wrong than we thought.
http://www.compnine.com/vid.php?vin=1G2HX52K9VH203055
If I am reading correctly, the vin belongs to a white car.
http://www.compnine.com/vid.php?vin=1G2HX52K9VH203055
If I am reading correctly, the vin belongs to a white car.
Re: There are a few things wrong with this ad
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:34 pm
It's not even supercharged if the VIN is correct.
Re: There are a few things wrong with this ad
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:40 pm
Not to mention that according to the History of the VIN on the Ebay page, it has over 100k miles put on it in the last 2 months. I feel bad for the one guy who bid on it so far.
Re: There are a few things wrong with this ad
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:52 pm
that's what i'm saying. IDK who puts 50K miles on a month for 2 months, but wow...
Re: There are a few things wrong with this ad
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:15 pm
There are some jobs that put on 50k miles in a year, but not 25k miles in a month. That's ~1k miles a day.
Re: There are a few things wrong with this ad
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:25 pm
Time to ask the seller some questions 
Re: There are a few things wrong with this ad
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:34 pm
I'm going in! 
Re: There are a few things wrong with this ad
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:35 pm
think about that - that's practically an oil change 2x a week at 3500 miles per oil change.LeSabre in Buffalo wrote:There are some jobs that put on 50k miles in a year, but not 25k miles in a month. That's ~1k miles a day.
i hope somebody asks questions.
Re: There are a few things wrong with this ad
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:42 pm
I just did
Hopefully something comes of this!I have a few questions about this particular Bonneville you have listed, and they are as follows:
The ad clearly states that it is a 1997, yet the vehicle pictured is pre-1996, I was hoping for some clarification in that regard
Also the ad mentions mileage that is inconsistent with the Vehicle history report of that VIN, I was hoping for yet more clarification in that regard
Another concern of mine is that of the drive train. The Bonneville was never offered with a 3.8 liter turbocharged engine, and the VIN does not indicate that this vehicle was manufactured with the supercharged variant either, I would like some clarification on that as well.
Finally, the VIN indicated likely belongs to a white car, was it repainted?
Thank you in advance for clarifying these matters prior to consideration of my bid.
Re: There are a few things wrong with this ad
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:43 pm
RJolly87 wrote:I just didHopefully something comes of this!I have a few questions about this particular Bonneville you have listed, and they are as follows:
The ad clearly states that it is a 1997, yet the vehicle pictured is pre-1996, I was hoping for some clarification in that regard
Also the ad mentions mileage that is inconsistent with the Vehicle history report of that VIN, I was hoping for yet more clarification in that regard
Another concern of mine is that of the drive train. The Bonneville was never offered with a 3.8 liter turbocharged engine, and the VIN does not indicate that this vehicle was manufactured with the supercharged variant either, I would like some clarification on that as well.
Finally, the VIN indicated likely belongs to a white car, was it repainted?
Thank you in advance for clarifying these matters prior to consideration of my bid.
Re: There are a few things wrong with this ad
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 7:03 pm
Bidding has ended on this item.
Re: There are a few things wrong with this ad
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:29 pm
Re: There are a few things wrong with this ad
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:34 pm
owned!!!!But the interior is still green
Re: There are a few things wrong with this ad
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:45 pm
And the exterior still isn't white...
Re: There are a few things wrong with this ad
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:38 pm
Nobody ever said it was white, that was the color listed on the RPO report for the VIN that was posted.TrueWildMan wrote:And the exterior still isn't white...
This looks a little better
http://www.compnine.com/vid.php?vin=1G2HX52L9R4231086
Oddly enough, I didn't get a response from the seller.
Re: There are a few things wrong with this ad
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:42 pm
It was a fleet car!!!
Re: There are a few things wrong with this ad
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:04 pm
Dood, I know that. Remember me? I'm the one that joined this and the original site in '03...RJolly87 wrote:Nobody ever said it was whiteTrueWildMan wrote:And the exterior still isn't white...
Re: There are a few things wrong with this ad
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:13 pm
I remember you, but that doesn't change anything.TrueWildMan wrote:Dood, I know that. Remember me? I'm the one that joined this and the original site in '03...RJolly87 wrote:Nobody ever said it was whiteTrueWildMan wrote:And the exterior still isn't white...
Unless this is a white curse reference.