Re: Blown 4.6 GXP
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 4:49 pm
I thought the CTS-V was an LS motor not N*?
The forum for Pontiac Bonneville enthusiasts
http://www.pontiacbonnevilleclub.com/forum/
http://www.pontiacbonnevilleclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12708
Yeah the newest CTS V is the detuned ZR1 Vette motor right?00Beast wrote:The first gen CTS-V had the LS6, then LS2, IIRC, and the new ones have the LS9, detuned. I think he wants to wait and let the prices drop.
It probably ws not broken in yet. My STS-V is noticeably quicker now then it was with the brand new engine. As far as the GXP Bonneville I had I never thought it was too fast and hated the delay while waiting for power to build. Dont get me wrong it was a nice car but I think it would have benefited from the vvt version of the northstar.CMNTMXR57 wrote:I've been watching STS-V's now for about a year. It's hard to pass up a 470hp S/C V8 that's handbuilt by Caddy's performance team, for $30K~ used. But knowing how finicky my Northstar is, I have sorta been apprehensive about a S/C version in an even tighter engine compartment and having ot work on it.
One thing I also noted on several test drives I've had, is that they seem "tight". Not tight like a great road car "tight", tight as in, the car didn't want to rev and run. Don't get me wrong, with the exception of one I drove, they got up and moved when you put the screws to it, but it didn't seem like they wanted to. This compared to the normal N* like in my GXP the loves to rev and loves to play. A couple of guys on the Caddy forum said a tune will change all that.
However, watching the new CTS-V mop up the Eurobloods left and right, I've got half a notion to hold out another year and let prices on them drop.
It is, but re-read.01bonneSC wrote:I thought the CTS-V was an LS motor not N*?