Chat about all things Bonneville (and related cars). Off-topic stuff should be in the lounge, and all mechanical problems should be posted in the proper forum.
Make sure it's not burning coolant. Those things love eating head gaskets...
Bye Bye: RIP sandrock
Sirius wrote:Think about it. You’re tooling down the road in your Prius, knowing full-well that this thing being green is as big a sham as federally mandated ethanol-enriched gas, Russia pulling out of Ukraine, and Obamacare.
Not that familiar with the later models of ths car, but at a glance, i m not fond of the body being shaved from the earlier style . I'm sure that the engine (4.0) and the interior accutrements more than make up for that. I've enjoyed the 2 oldsmobiles I've had in my time.
1988 SSE-Gone but not forgotten. 2001 SSEI-304,572 miles, 3.5 Pulley, Intense PCM, Intense FWI Spectre filter, 160 tstat, ngk iridiums, belden wires, Silverstars-high and low beam, rebuilt tranny, shift kit, cooler, Dex VI fluid, replace the rear compressor and lines and level sensor, Monroe air shocks in back, FE5 struts and Moog strut mounts, Moog stabilizer bars, AC\Delco control arms.
2004 SLE-Stock, 195,000 miles,oldest son's baby now
2000 Ford Ranger-Stock, 352,000 hard, pizza delivery miles, new control arms (upper and lower), new(used) tranny
Made the purchase today, and just got home from a great, relaxing drive through the tri-state area (Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio). Took about 2 hours to get to Pittsburgh from Canton...went a more scenic route, and then got trapped in traffic at the Fort Pitt Tunnel.
Pics to come...
Man, I love that 4 litre V8...
"SLE without the ugly" - leather, climate control, sound, 3.05 gearing, 180* t-stat, tints. http://www.gillsystems.com
I miss my 'Rora!!! I had a beautiful 1998 model until I wrecked it a little over a year ago. I got the car early in 2007 with 43,000 miles on it and had to say goodbye to it with just over 75,000 miles on the odometer. Of all the cars I've ever owned, that was my hands-down favorite. I still get wistful when I see one going down the road and I'm determined to own one again someday. I have to agree with Spidey that I'm not as fond of the second generation (2001-2003 models) Auroras as I am the Classics (1995-1999 models).
The 4.0 engine is super reliable and surprisingly fuel efficient. There are guys over on the ACNA board (http://aurorah.proboards.com/index.cgi?) who have Auroras with over 300,000 miles on the original drivetrain. Wish I had been able to keep mine that long.
I found the fuel economy to be comparable to the 3800. I got about 30 on the highway and 18 around town on premium or mid-grade gas. I took a pretty significant hit on regular (23 hwy / 15 city) and could feel a difference in performance. When gas topped $4 a gallon a couple of summers ago, I ran regular with a bottle of octane booster from the dollar store in every tank and regained most of the mileage and performance for less than the net cost of mid-grade.
When I was shopping for a car last month, I seriously considered two Auroras--a 2001 model with a 3.5L engine and a 1996 model. I passed them both up in favor of the Bonneville because it was about two/thirds the price of either of the Auroras and had the same number of miles on it as the 2001 and far less than the 1996. So far, I'm pleased with my decision, considering what I paid.
Auroras are special cars. Enjoy yours...
Last edited by human on Wed Nov 03, 2010 6:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Daily Driver: 2011 Chevy Impala LT
Weekend Toy: 1995 Olds Aurora
Sold but not forgotten: 1997 Olds LSS 1995 Pontiac Bonneville SLE