Torque Converters performance vs stock
- bobtaz13
- Posts like an LG3

- Posts: 308
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:22 am
- Year and Trim: 2001 SSEi
1991 SE - Location: Minnesota
Torque Converters performance vs stock
So my 01 SSEi is in the trany shop. When he pulled it apart he found the torque converter was bad, and just went out of warranty. So now i can replace the (DACCO brand) converter for $165 or Get a performance converter from Intense with a drilled flex plate for $500. I can get (barrow) the money but is it worth it with my mods?

2001 SSEi | Galaxy Silver | GenV supercharger P&P | Intense 3.2 MPS | Intense FWI 4"| Custom PCM | TOG Ceramic headers | Magnaflow 3" cat | 180° stat | Aeroforce scan gauge | PRJ plug wires | PRJ fuel rails | Silicone vacuum lines| AP103 plugs | 3.2 MPS | 42.5# injectors | Intense 1x cam kit | YT 1.8 Rockers | 105# springs | Meziere HD pump | N* Tb | 185mm MAF | 2" Phenolic Intercooler | Oil pressure kit | L32 short block | 5% overdrive SFI Balancer | L67 heads custom ported | EBC USR Rotors | EBC Red stuff pads | Custom HID Fog lights, with HI-beam over ride | Polyurethane motor mount | Energy Suspension end links | GXP Shocks/Struts | Custom Drop springs Front, Rear FE5 Springs | GXP Strut tower Brace | GP GXP 18x8 Rims | Polished Exhaust tips | Triple Edge High Performance Street/Strip 4T65E-HD |
- willwren
- Retired Admin

- Posts: 65489
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 11:07 pm
- Year and Trim: .
93 SSEi
95 SLE (SC)
97 Buick LeSabre - Location: Oregon WCBF'04, '05, '06, '07, '08, '09, '10, '11 Survivor
- Contact:
Re: Torque Converters performance vs stock
In my experience, figure out what stall you THINK you want, then go halfway back to stock. Driveability will be affected in daily use. I've driven 3 Bonnevilles with higher stall, and I didn't like 2 of them. One of them went back to stock within a year.
Mine is only a small step higher than stock (I don't recall what stall now, it's been about 3 years but I can probably look it up). In other words, just don't go too far if you want the car as a DD.
Mine is only a small step higher than stock (I don't recall what stall now, it's been about 3 years but I can probably look it up). In other words, just don't go too far if you want the car as a DD.

Click here for mod list for both cars
93 SSEi, 95 SLE (supercharged) 97 Buick LeSabre Limited
PontiacDad at WCBF '04: Cruise control? That's like surrendering!
Comprehensive guide to troubleshooting, rebuilding, and modifying Eaton Superchargers
- 2000Silverbullet
- Retired Gearhead

- Posts: 12225
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 5:06 pm
- Year and Trim: 2000 SSEi, 79 Firebird, 88 Jeep, 11 Yukon Denali
- Location: Powell River BC - 7 time WCBF Survivor
Re: Torque Converters performance vs stock
I agree. Don't go higher than 2800 rpm stall. 2400 is stock and would be fine with stock gearing. 3000 is beginning to get bad for DD unless you have 3.7 final gearing.

2000 SSEi - SilverBullet - 78,000 kms, 4" "straight shot" custom headlight ram air inlet, TOGs, 1.9's, Lsd, 2.9-3.4"MPS 10-15 psi, Ported GenV, EGR eliminated, OR pushrods, oil volume kit, trani cooler & shift kit, Titanium retainers, 90 lb springs, 160 Stat, 42# injectors, Fuel pump voltage increase, Wideband O2, 3" to dual 2 1/2" Magnaflows, Snow Meth/water injection, after SC temp gauge, 255/50WR17, timing commander set 15-18*@WOT, 2 speed Fan over-ride, disabled DRL, Solid motor mount, Meziere Electric water pump, adjustable fuel pressure regulator, Drilled & slotted rotors/ceramics, GXP sway bars and STB, Upgraded and rebuilt transmission with ZZP 2500 rpm stall TC, Pioneer Bluetooth stereo with sub and 800 W amps, PB 13.5 quarter, (April 2014 car of the month)
-
00Beast
- Retired Site Developer

- Posts: 20960
- Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 10:30 pm
- Year and Trim: '17 Silverado 1500
- Location: MN/IA
- Contact:
Re: Torque Converters performance vs stock
Paul, IIRC 1850 is stock, if I remember what Don told me. I would go no more than 2200 on your car if it's a Daily driver. sonoma_zr2 had a 3000 stall on his 97 and hated it. Don't go too wild, it won't be driveable.
Bye Bye:

RIP sandrock

RIP sandrock
Sirius wrote:Think about it. You’re tooling down the road in your Prius, knowing full-well that this thing being green is as big a sham as federally mandated ethanol-enriched gas, Russia pulling out of Ukraine, and Obamacare.
Re: Torque Converters performance vs stock
2750 was nice with 3.29 gears. I'm running a 3500 now with 3.69s and I don't notice a huge difference, but that's just me. Keep in mine my car is made for that high. Also Intense and ZZP have different numbers meaning different things so read about that.
2000 SLE


-
Jrs3800
- Retired Admin/Techinfo Admin

- Posts: 26009
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 2:08 pm
- Year and Trim: 03 SLE, 95 SE, 95 TS SE
- Location: Space Coast, or at least it used to be
Re: Torque Converters performance vs stock
The stall speed will vary...
All of the 2.97, 3.06 and 3.33 GM FWD all had an 1897 Stall( 1900 pretty much ), But all of them would stall well over 2000, some 2200-2300... The stall also has to do with the weight of the vehicle and the amount of power made..
Depends on what the Mods are... Can't see your sig right now..
For most purposes a stock stall would be fine... But a couple hundred RPM's higher may not hurt either...
About the only GM 3800's that ever got the low stall speed( 1450 ) was the 2.84 and the 2.86 gear ratio
All of the 2.97, 3.06 and 3.33 GM FWD all had an 1897 Stall( 1900 pretty much ), But all of them would stall well over 2000, some 2200-2300... The stall also has to do with the weight of the vehicle and the amount of power made..
Depends on what the Mods are... Can't see your sig right now..
For most purposes a stock stall would be fine... But a couple hundred RPM's higher may not hurt either...
About the only GM 3800's that ever got the low stall speed( 1450 ) was the 2.84 and the 2.86 gear ratio
Last edited by Jrs3800 on Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
alexcoqui
- Posts like an L36

- Posts: 821
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 12:56 pm
- Year and Trim: 2001 Blue SLE - 2001 Black SSEI - 2005 Grey Aztek
- Location: Puerto Rico
Re: Torque Converters performance vs stock
But, are there diffrent choices when buying a stock one from gm? The reason I'm asking is because I too am rebuilding my tranny & i want to know what to tell the mechanic. Is there a diffrence between a converter from a 3.05 and a converter from a 3.29?
2001 Blue SLE - 1995 Black SSE - 1988 Black GTA


- 2000Silverbullet
- Retired Gearhead

- Posts: 12225
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 5:06 pm
- Year and Trim: 2000 SSEi, 79 Firebird, 88 Jeep, 11 Yukon Denali
- Location: Powell River BC - 7 time WCBF Survivor
Re: Torque Converters performance vs stock
No Ed, my stall is 2400 rpm. Have you ever stalled your car.......maybe yours is different! Mine has stalled at the same rpm since new.Paul, IIRC 1850 is stock, if I remember what Don told me. I would go no more than 2200 on your car

2000 SSEi - SilverBullet - 78,000 kms, 4" "straight shot" custom headlight ram air inlet, TOGs, 1.9's, Lsd, 2.9-3.4"MPS 10-15 psi, Ported GenV, EGR eliminated, OR pushrods, oil volume kit, trani cooler & shift kit, Titanium retainers, 90 lb springs, 160 Stat, 42# injectors, Fuel pump voltage increase, Wideband O2, 3" to dual 2 1/2" Magnaflows, Snow Meth/water injection, after SC temp gauge, 255/50WR17, timing commander set 15-18*@WOT, 2 speed Fan over-ride, disabled DRL, Solid motor mount, Meziere Electric water pump, adjustable fuel pressure regulator, Drilled & slotted rotors/ceramics, GXP sway bars and STB, Upgraded and rebuilt transmission with ZZP 2500 rpm stall TC, Pioneer Bluetooth stereo with sub and 800 W amps, PB 13.5 quarter, (April 2014 car of the month)
-
Jrs3800
- Retired Admin/Techinfo Admin

- Posts: 26009
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 2:08 pm
- Year and Trim: 03 SLE, 95 SE, 95 TS SE
- Location: Space Coast, or at least it used to be
Re: Torque Converters performance vs stock
No, for all intent purposes they have the same stall speed...alexcoqui wrote:But, are there diffrent choices when buying a stock one from gm? The reason I'm asking is because I too am rebuilding my tranny & i want to know what to tell the mechanic. Is there a diffrence between a converter from a 3.05 and a converter from a 3.29?
I am almost in the same boat and am going round and round as to what I need to do with the van... With the extra added power I have with the cam in the Van I can stall the converter higher then I can with my unmodded 3800's... The van has a stock stall of 1897, stalls a lot higher than that... But I think I am running through the Torque curve too quick with the 3.33 gears... The cam seems to produce more Torque all around than the stock cam so I am thinking about going to a 3.06 ratio... I think I will be doing the 3.06 with a stock stall( 1897 )
I think with the car you have, and the 3.29 gears you will be using? I would stick with a stock stall... 1900 Stall should be enough
-
alexcoqui
- Posts like an L36

- Posts: 821
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 12:56 pm
- Year and Trim: 2001 Blue SLE - 2001 Black SSEI - 2005 Grey Aztek
- Location: Puerto Rico
Re: Torque Converters performance vs stock
Cool, thanks.
2001 Blue SLE - 1995 Black SSE - 1988 Black GTA



