Which brake rotors didn't work for me (RL field test)

Talk about modifications, or anything else associated with performance enhancements. Have a new idea for performance/reliability? Post it here. No idea is stupid! (please use Detailing and Appearance for cosmetic ideas)
Post Reply
Tony94
Banned
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:27 pm
Year and Trim: 1994 SLE

Which brake rotors didn't work for me (RL field test)

Post by Tony94 »

Manufacturer: Power Stop/Autospecialty
Product: Cross-drilled brake rotors
Warranty: 2 weeks or 500 miles (buyer beware! RED flag!)
Purchase date: 3/03
Replacement date: 2008
Malfunction date: 2005
Malfunction type: Rotor warp causing brake pulsing and shudder

User Experience: Only lasted few miles of LIGHT usage. They say they can be turned, but after seeing the meaty rotors I got from Raybestos (Advanced Technology brand (?), but not the top of the line offering), why bother?

Recommendation: Select rotors by WEIGHT! More metal trumps theories and snake oil: holes, slots, blah, blah...

(PowerStop: Wanna give me my $169 back? I'll send you back your rotors that suck.)

Tony
Image
'94 SLE, 169k: Black grill from a '97 (not shown). Raybestos Advanced Technology rotors and pads. Factory trans cooler from an SSEi. Silverstar Ultra high and low beams.
User avatar
zuper8
Posts like an L67
Posts like an L67
Posts: 1219
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 12:26 am
Year and Trim: 96 SSEi- 157K
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: Which brake rotors didn't work for me (RL field test)

Post by zuper8 »

interesting, thanks for posting. i'd also be interested to see how your experience with the raybestos-advance rotors goes. i put those on a corolla, and that little car warped them in months. not very happy. but they certainly were less than $169, so hey.
- Rachael
Image
swampthing
Certified Bonneville Nut
Certified Bonneville Nut
Posts: 2711
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 12:13 pm
Year and Trim: 2000 ssei gone but not forgotten
Location: Citrus Springs, Fl

Re: Which brake rotors didn't work for me (RL field test)

Post by swampthing »

wow! sorry they gave you such crappy service! i have slotted cross drilled of another brand however and love them no warping whatsoever, if supercars come with them i dont believe its all just snake oil
2000 ssei gone but not forgotten

Current fleet:
2009 G8 v6, 2009 Avalanche LTZ, 2013 Volt
Tony94
Banned
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:27 pm
Year and Trim: 1994 SLE

Re: Which brake rotors didn't work for me (RL field test)

Post by Tony94 »

swampthing wrote:wow! sorry they gave you such crappy service! i have slotted cross drilled of another brand however and love them no warping whatsoever, if supercars come with them i dont believe its all just snake oil

Note that my '94 weighs in at over 3800 lbs. Your '00 is surely quite a bit lighter and probably has bigger rotors to begin with (?).
Image
'94 SLE, 169k: Black grill from a '97 (not shown). Raybestos Advanced Technology rotors and pads. Factory trans cooler from an SSEi. Silverstar Ultra high and low beams.
swampthing
Certified Bonneville Nut
Certified Bonneville Nut
Posts: 2711
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 12:13 pm
Year and Trim: 2000 ssei gone but not forgotten
Location: Citrus Springs, Fl

Re: Which brake rotors didn't work for me (RL field test)

Post by swampthing »

bigger rotors but i believe a stock 2000 ssei weighs in at 3750 or so. but i'm not arguing that they didn't screw up i just didn't want someone else shopping rotors to stay away from cross-drilled slotted thinking they were the next tornado air system....
2000 ssei gone but not forgotten

Current fleet:
2009 G8 v6, 2009 Avalanche LTZ, 2013 Volt
User avatar
BonneMe
Certified Bonneville Nut
Certified Bonneville Nut
Posts: 11879
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 10:45 am
Year and Trim: 2001 BMW 330i
ZSP Sport Pack
Moonroof
Location: Eagan, MN

Re: Which brake rotors didn't work for me (RL field test)

Post by BonneMe »

Tony94 wrote:
swampthing wrote:wow! sorry they gave you such crappy service! i have slotted cross drilled of another brand however and love them no warping whatsoever, if supercars come with them i dont believe its all just snake oil

Note that my '94 weighs in at over 3800 lbs. Your '00 is surely quite a bit lighter and probably has bigger rotors to begin with (?).
2000's are heavier than a 92-95 generation, your car with an empty tank is actually around 3400-3500lbs... But he has 4 wheel disk, and an inch larger front brake IIRC.

Reading this, it appears you got two years out of them (3/03 to 2005?) That sounds pretty *dang* good for a brake on an H body if you ask me lol..

Cross drilled, slotted, carbon/ceramic, etc all have a point and a place. But many times these features become dangerous when they're done on inferrior material and done with inferrior processes compared to the high performance variant. Cross drilled rotors on a full on Baer system, are created very differently from the parts counter stuff normally....
Jason Z - Exposed Autos
Image
2001 BMW 330i
- Titanium Silver - Sport Package - 3 Pedals - Koni Yellow/H&R Sport
2006 Volkswagen GTI - (gone) Tornado Red - DSG, Stage II~280hp/325tq
1993 Pontiac Bonneville - (gone) Purple Pearl H4U/SLE. Loud
swampthing
Certified Bonneville Nut
Certified Bonneville Nut
Posts: 2711
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 12:13 pm
Year and Trim: 2000 ssei gone but not forgotten
Location: Citrus Springs, Fl

Re: Which brake rotors didn't work for me (RL field test)

Post by swampthing »

agreed, I took a chance on mine and they are still performing well after one year. I only pid like 250 for all four with pads the rotors are good the pads suck! so when they wear out im gonna get good quality ones
2000 ssei gone but not forgotten

Current fleet:
2009 G8 v6, 2009 Avalanche LTZ, 2013 Volt
Tony94
Banned
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:27 pm
Year and Trim: 1994 SLE

Re: Which brake rotors didn't work for me (RL field test)

Post by Tony94 »

swampthing wrote:bigger rotors but i believe a stock 2000 ssei weighs in at 3750 or so. but i'm not arguing that they didn't screw up i just didn't want someone else shopping rotors to stay away from cross-drilled slotted thinking they were the next tornado air system....
I would stay away from them if they are "thin" compared to "heavy duty" replacements. Larger diameter makes a big difference also: I remember contemplating Grand Prix brakes (11"?) for my 1980 Trans Am (10"?) as per Pontiac mag article/study. Apparently, the Raybestos units have a "no turn guarantee" while the AutoSpecialty cross-drilled units had a junkyard part length warranty. Indicative? Ask me in a year and a half or so about how the Raybestos parts are working for me. (Note that the boxes said "Advanced Technology", but I ordered the mid level units.. beyond "Professional Grade" though).
BonneMe wrote: 2000's are heavier than a 92-95 generation,
That doesn't sound correct. 2000 was the new generation body sytle and surely was lighter???
BonneMe wrote:your car with an empty tank is actually around 3400-3500lbs... But he has 4 wheel disk, and an inch larger front brake IIRC.
I remember going over the scale and weighing in at 3820, but I suppose my photographic memory" could, within an extremely small probability, be wrong. ;)
BonneMe wrote:Reading this, it appears you got two years out of them (3/03 to 2005?) That sounds pretty *dang* good for a brake on an H body if you ask me lol..
It started small and got progressively worse. The failure point is when I first noted pulsation in braking, which was way before I actually replaced them. Seriously, the meat on the Raybestos units is so dramatically different, that I'm not even going to bother turning the too-thin cross-drilled ones. What a stupid theory to begin with: a bit more cooling can compensate for more metal.
BonneMe wrote:Cross drilled, slotted, carbon/ceramic, etc all have a point and a place. But many times these features become dangerous when they're done on inferrior material and done with inferrior processes compared to the high performance variant. Cross drilled rotors on a full on Baer system, are created very differently from the parts counter stuff normally....
I was just noting my experience with a specific brand of cross-drilled rotors, not cross-drilled rotors in general.
Image
'94 SLE, 169k: Black grill from a '97 (not shown). Raybestos Advanced Technology rotors and pads. Factory trans cooler from an SSEi. Silverstar Ultra high and low beams.
User avatar
willwren
Retired Admin
Retired Admin
Posts: 65489
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 11:07 pm
Year and Trim: .
93 SSEi
95 SLE (SC)
97 Buick LeSabre
Location: Oregon WCBF'04, '05, '06, '07, '08, '09, '10, '11 Survivor
Contact:

Re: Which brake rotors didn't work for me (RL field test)

Post by willwren »

Tony, 2000 and newer ARE heavier. Age has nothing to do with it.
Image
Click here for mod list for both cars
93 SSEi, 95 SLE (supercharged) 97 Buick LeSabre Limited
PontiacDad at WCBF '04: Cruise control? That's like surrendering!
Comprehensive guide to troubleshooting, rebuilding, and modifying Eaton Superchargers
Jrs3800
Retired Admin/Techinfo Admin
Retired Admin/Techinfo Admin
Posts: 26009
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 2:08 pm
Year and Trim: 03 SLE, 95 SE, 95 TS SE
Location: Space Coast, or at least it used to be

Re: Which brake rotors didn't work for me (RL field test)

Post by Jrs3800 »

Funny... My 95 SE weighs 3465 Lbs with no fuel... Only thing I need to be an SLE is Leather... The 00+ Bonneville are 3700-3800 Easily...

Just to compare, My 95 TS with the 3800 TPI comes in at 3700 Lbs
swampthing
Certified Bonneville Nut
Certified Bonneville Nut
Posts: 2711
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 12:13 pm
Year and Trim: 2000 ssei gone but not forgotten
Location: Citrus Springs, Fl

Re: Which brake rotors didn't work for me (RL field test)

Post by swampthing »

just because they redesigned the car doesn't mean it's lighter. happens all the time with sedans
2000 ssei gone but not forgotten

Current fleet:
2009 G8 v6, 2009 Avalanche LTZ, 2013 Volt
Jrs3800
Retired Admin/Techinfo Admin
Retired Admin/Techinfo Admin
Posts: 26009
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 2:08 pm
Year and Trim: 03 SLE, 95 SE, 95 TS SE
Location: Space Coast, or at least it used to be

Re: Which brake rotors didn't work for me (RL field test)

Post by Jrs3800 »

Agree 100%...

Friend used to have a Malibu Maxx.. I fell on the floor when I found out it was a couple hundred heavier than my Bonneville...LOL

I bought a set of Rotors that were Bendix replacements... Very thick and beefy even compared to a stock piece... I have been driving on them for 4 years... No warp..
User avatar
clm2112
Retired Gearhead
Retired Gearhead
Posts: 2156
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 9:11 pm
Year and Trim: 1990 Bonneville LE
Location: Fayette City,PA

Re: Which brake rotors didn't work for me (RL field test)

Post by clm2112 »

swampthing wrote:just because they redesigned the car doesn't mean it's lighter. happens all the time with sedans
My experience as well. The cars of the late 80's are pretty light compared to cars post and prior. Simple, boxy, low-tech. I may be mistaken, but my base model 1990 LE (along with it's cousins) is probably one of the lightest examples of the FWD H-Body's.
Bye Bye 1990 Bonneville LE... Now it belongs to my daughter
In the Garage: 2009 Subaru Outback, 1987 Camaro, 2006 SV650S, 1995 Regal 182 "ASANAGI", 1962 Ford Galaxie 500, 1995 Ford F150 XL 4WD, 1953 Farmall Cub
Jrs3800
Retired Admin/Techinfo Admin
Retired Admin/Techinfo Admin
Posts: 26009
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 2:08 pm
Year and Trim: 03 SLE, 95 SE, 95 TS SE
Location: Space Coast, or at least it used to be

Re: Which brake rotors didn't work for me (RL field test)

Post by Jrs3800 »

Yes curt you are correct..

I had a few more options on my 91 LE and it came in at 3390 Lbs... Pretty light for a Full size car..
User avatar
67goat
SLE Member
SLE Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 2:39 pm
Year and Trim: '01 SSEi
Location: Chicago, IL.

Re: Which brake rotors didn't work for me (RL field test)

Post by 67goat »

I intalled cross drilled rotors a while back that I purchased from Summit Racing (their brand name). They are pretty beefy rotors. Initially had some pulsating when I first installed. Pulled them off and found that the edges where the drilled portion meets the face of the rotor was not finished very smoothly. Put them on a drill press to mildly clean up any possible burrs, got new pads again (lifetime warranty), re-installed and have been trouble free for a year now.
_________________________________________________________________
2001 SSEi - NEW MODS in L32 - FWI, colder plugs, 180 t-stat, 3.5 pulley, 1.95 rockers, TOG headers and just about every Intense Trans upgrades they recommended.
OLD MODS in L67 - include FWI, colder plugs (Autolites), 180 t-stat, 3.4 pulley and 1.95 rockers.
(Previously owned '95 SSEi, RIP)
swampthing
Certified Bonneville Nut
Certified Bonneville Nut
Posts: 2711
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 12:13 pm
Year and Trim: 2000 ssei gone but not forgotten
Location: Citrus Springs, Fl

Re: Which brake rotors didn't work for me (RL field test)

Post by swampthing »

my slotted rotors make a little noise when you press hard but no vibrations from it and the car stops great!
2000 ssei gone but not forgotten

Current fleet:
2009 G8 v6, 2009 Avalanche LTZ, 2013 Volt
Post Reply